Evaluation shows UV-LED irradiation has similar effects on coliphages and human viruses, highlighting their differing absolute sensitivities.
Ultraviolet (UV) disinfection is a powerful method for inactivating viruses. However, comparative wavelength-dependent sensitivities among human viruses and bacteriophages remain poorly characterized. Here, we evaluated the virucidal efficiencies of UV-light emitting diode (UV-LED) against multiple coliphages (MS2, Qβ, PhiX174, and T1) and mammalian viruses, including respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and human metapneumovirus (HMPV). We used a standardized irradiation system equipped with interchangeable UV-LED modules (250–365 nm), a low-pressure mercury lamp (254 nm), and a filtered krypton-chloride excimer lamp (222 nm). All coliphages exhibited wavelength-dependent inactivation with maximal efficiency at 263–270 nm, closely matching the action spectra of RSV and HMPV (r > 0.94, p < 0.001). However, their absolute UV sensitivities were markedly lower: under 254–281 nm irradiation. RSV and HMPV were approximately 21 and 12 times more sensitive than MS2, respectively. In contrast, far-UVC (222 nm) irradiation reduced these differences, indicating simultaneous damage to viral genomes and structural proteins. These results demonstrated that coliphages and human viruses exhibit similar wavelength-dependent sensitivity to UV-LED irradiation but differ in their absolute susceptibility. Therefore, while coliphages can be conservative surrogates for evaluating UV-LED virucidal performance, their applicability to far-UVC assessments should be interpreted with caution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mawatari et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: