Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Survey reveals that security and data integrity concerns hinder adoption of wearable medical devices in chronic disease management.
Purpose This research study aims to highlight the innovation of wearable medical devices (WMDs) and their expanding role in advancing precision medicine within the healthcare sector. The study focuses on exploring physicians’ perceptions regarding security, confidentiality and their satisfaction with the accuracy of data collected from WMDs. Design/methodology/approach Using a five-round Delphi method, the study engaged a panel of 19 experts and conducted a survey as well as a set of semi-structured interviews to gather insights and achieve consensus for the survey items before launching a large-scale physician survey. Findings WMDs provide valuable real-time insights by continuously monitoring vital signs such as electrocardiography, blood oxygen saturation, movement and sleep patterns – crucial for managing chronic diseases and encouraging healthier lifestyles. Despite recognizing the potential of WMDs, physicians remain concerned about the confidentiality and integrity of patient data due to the lack of transparency from manufacturers about associated risks and incidents of device hacking. Practical implications The findings suggest that to support wider adoption of WMDs in healthcare, manufacturers and regulatory bodies must prioritize improving data security and transparency. Enhancing the accuracy of collected data and clearly communicating the safeguards in place can strengthen physicians’ trust and facilitate the integration of WMDs into routine care, especially for managing chronic conditions. Originality/value This study contributes original insights into the relatively underexplored area of physician attitudes toward WMDs in the context of data integrity and security. It underscores the importance of physician trust in data accuracy and device transparency as key drivers of adoption, offering valuable guidance for developers, policymakers and healthcare organizations aiming to leverage WMDs for precision medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: