Evaluation shows WRF-Solar accurately estimates solar radiation in East Asia, suggesting a need to address aerosols and clouds for better predictions.
Accurate solar radiation forecasting with numerical weather prediction (NWP) is critical for optimizing photovoltaic power generation. This study evaluates short-term (<36 h) performance of the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF-Solar) and its ensemble version (WRF-Solar EPS) for global horizontal irradiance (GHI) and direct horizontal irradiance (DIR) over East Asia (December 2019–November 2020) against geostationary satellite retrievals. Both models effectively capture GHI spatial patterns but exhibit systematic overestimation (biases: 17.27–17.68 W/m2), with peak errors in northwest China and the North China Plain. Temporal mismatches between bias (maximum in winter-spring) and RMSE/MAE (maximum in summer) may indicate seasonal variability in error signatures dominated by aerosols and clouds. For DIR, regional biases prevail: overestimation in the Tibetan Plateau and northwest China, and underestimation in southern China and Indo-China Peninsula. Errors (RMSE and MAE) are larger than for GHI, with peaks in southeast and northwest China, likely linked to poor cloud–aerosol simulations. WRF-Solar EPS shows no significant bias reduction but modest RMSE/MAE improvements in summer–autumn, particularly in southeast China, indicating limited enhancement of short-term predictive stability. Both WRF-Solar and WRF-Solar EPS require further refinements in cloud–aerosol parameterizations to mitigate systematic errors over East Asia in future applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: