PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 9, 2025Cancers2 citationsOpen Access

Specialist Neurology Involvement and Impact in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Neurotoxicity: Experience in a Unified Healthcare System

View Full Paper
BSBenjamin E. SchroederPPP.B. Aravind PrasadOGOpe Gbadegesin

Key Points

  • To investigate the involvement and impact of neurology services in managing immune checkpoint inhibitor-related neurotoxicity.
  • Multi-centre retrospective case note review in the UK
  • Reviewed predefined proforma to gather data
  • Identified patients with N-irAE and their management pathways
  • 109 patients with N-irAE identified, median time from treatment to symptoms was 52 days
  • 79.8% had neurology involvement, varying by centre
  • Neurology input resulted in improved diagnosis, with greater rates of MR imaging, lumbar puncture, and neurophysiology conducted.

Abstract

Background: Neurological immune related adverse events (N-irAEs) following immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The early involvement of neurological services is therefore recommended to assist diagnosis and guide management. However, the practical experience of specialist neurology involvement is poorly understood. Methods: A multi-centre, retrospective case note review was performed in a unified healthcare setting in the United Kingdom via predetermined proforma to investigate the involvement and impact of neurology services in this setting. Results: One hundred and nine patients with N-irAE were identified with a median time from ICI treatment to symptom onset of 52 days. Neurology service models, reasons for referral and referral rates varied by centre. Overall, eighty-seven (79.8%) patients (range 52.9–100% by centre) had neurology involvement. Neurology input was associated with younger age (median 67.2 vs. 72.8 years), anatomical location (Central > Peripheral) and severity of neurotoxicity (p < 0.001, q < 0.004). Patients with neurology involvement were more likely to undergo specialist investigations: MR imaging (p = 0.041, q = 0.043), lumbar puncture (p < 0.001, q < 0.004), and neurophysiology (p = 0.005, q = 0.007) resulting in a broader range of specific N-irAE diagnoses. Steroids were appropriately prescribed, with second line treatment (Intravenous immunoglobulins/Plasma exchange) associated with neurology involvement. At lower grades (CTCAE ≤ 2), resolution rates were similar in those with or without neurology involvement. At grades 3–4, one-third of patients with neurology involvement had resolution. In a centre with a model of early neurology involvement for all possible N-irAEs the aetiology of the neurological presentation was changed in 63.7%. Conclusions: This study highlights the potential to improve diagnosis and treatment algorithms and therefore patient outcomes through development of uniform N-irAE models of care to support this area of growing clinical need.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schroeder et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69401d682d562116f28f9100https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17243935
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper