Comparative analysis reveals dynamic performance needs in off-grid hydrogen systems, highlighting battery storage options.
Off-grid renewable power-to-hydrogen (ReP2H) systems face stability and economic constraints driven by the variability of renewable resources. This paper presents a comparative analysis of grid-forming (GFM) service requirements under three approaches, i.e., centralized GFM battery energy storage system (BESS), GFM electrolyzers and coordinated multi-source GFM strategies. We first establish detailed GFM models for off-grid ReP2H systems under each approach and then conduct hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) real-time simulations. By evaluating both dynamic performance and cost, we identify the strengths and limitations of the three strategies and quantify the GFM capacity needed to ensure stable off-grid hydrogen production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: