Randomized trial demonstrates comparable safety and efficacy of rivastigmine patch in Alzheimer's patients, suggesting potential benefits over existing therapies.
Background Rivastigmine may offer greater efficacy and convenience of use with a novel formulation than previously reported. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel, twice-weekly rivastigmine patch (TW-4752N) (TW) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients with mild to moderate dementia. Methods This was a multicenter, phase III, double-blind study comparing TW and an existing rivastigmine transdermal patch (RT) with an open-label extension. The primary endpoint was the change in ADAS-Jcog total score at week 24 from baseline. Secondary endpoints included the ADAS-Jcog total score at weeks 8, 16, and 24. Results A total of 354 and 362 patients were available for efficacy and safety analysis, respectively. Changes in ADAS-Jcog total score at week 24 from baseline were similar between the two groups in the full analysis set with an intergroup difference of −0.84 ± 0.44 (95% CI, −1.695 to 0.016) and with the upper limit of the 95% CI being below the non-inferiority margin of 1.1, demonstrating the non-inferiority of TW. However, analysis of the per-protocol set demonstrated a significant intergroup difference in favor of TW likely suggesting a greater treatment effect with TW than with RT (p = 0.032). Adverse events (AEs) reported in ≥3% of patients were similar between the groups, with the only AE with an intergroup difference of ≥10% in incidence being application site pruritus (TW/RT, 27.6%/17.1%). Conclusions TW represents a viable alternative option of interest to patients with AD, providing comparable or potentially greater efficacy than RT and comparable safety, as well as greater convenience of use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakamura et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: