Case-control design found the Tree Drawing Test effectively identifies suicidal ideation in adolescents, indicating strong predictive values.
Objective To examine the validity of the Tree Drawing Test Suicide Ideation Assessment Scale (TDT-SIAS) for screening suicidal ideation in adolescents. Methods A case–control design was employed, involving 36 adolescents with suicidal ideation and 58 adolescents without suicidal ideation. All participants completed the Tree Drawing Test, and their responses were analyzed using computer-based image recognition and data acquisition techniques with the TDT-SIAS. Statistical analyses were then conducted. Results Significant differences were observed in total scores between the suicidal ideation group and the non-suicidal group (p < 0.001). Using a cutoff score of 9, the Youden Index was 0.901, with a sensitivity of 0.935, specificity of 0.966, positive predictive value of 0.956, and negative predictive value of 0.949. Inter-rater reliability (Cohen’s kappa) ranged from 0.779 to 0.961. Conclusion The TDT-SIAS demonstrated good screening performance and effectively distinguished adolescents with suicidal ideation from those without. It may serve as a preliminary screening tool for adolescent suicidal ideation. However, limitations of this study include the relatively small sample size and the lack of consideration for cultural differences, which may affect generalizability. Future studies should expand sample size and examine cross-cultural applicability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: