Survey reveals positive attitudes toward farmer first program in Odisha, indicating benefits in productivity and decision-making for beneficiaries.
This study investigates the attitudes of 148 beneficiaries (77 crop-based, 71 horticulture-based) of the farmer FIRST programme (FFP) in Khordha district, Odisha, using a validated Likert-scale instrument and ex-post facto design. Results showed that 55.8 % of crop-based and 66.2 % of horticulture-based farmers held favourable attitudes toward the programme, with 25.97 % and 14.09 % respectively having a highly favourable outlook. Weighted Mean Scores for core dimensions highlight strong endorsement of participatory decision-making (WMS: 3.87 for crops, 4.14 for horticulture), improved productivity (WMS: 3.66 and 4.10) and programme relevance (WMS: 3.70 and 4.09), affirming FFPs’ positive impact on farm confidence and researcher-farmer collaboration. However, notable concerns persist regarding equitable benefit sharing, affordability of technologies and inclusion-specifically, scores for farm women and landless inclusion (WMS: 3.57 crop, 3.68 horticulture) and low ratings for benefit distribution and communication (WMS: ~1.7 for both groups). Regression analysis identifies education, mass media use, annual income, cosmopoliteness and self-esteem as significant predictors influencing farmer attitudes, accounting for 61-69 % of attitude variation (Adjusted R2 = 0.62–0.61). Practical implications include the need for targeted outreach to marginalised farmers, affordable technology solutions and inclusive extension strategies to maximise FFPs’ impact. These results reinforce participatory extension as a driver of empowerment, innovation and sustainable agricultural development in diverse, transitioning rural contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monikarani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: