Analysis reveals symmetry-breaking in public good levels among countries under free trade, indicating economic implications in equilibrium settings.
In this study, we analyze a symmetric policy game in a two‐country model in which domestic policy affects a Ricardian comparative advantage. Considering a two‐good, one‐factor set‐up in which each country's government provides a productive public good, we show that ex ante identical countries under free trade always choose different levels of public goods in the Nash equilibrium – meaning symmetry‐breaking always occurs. We also examine how our analysis is modified in the presence of trade costs and in a multi‐good set‐up. Moreover, we present a more elaborate model with input–output linkages and entry regulation in an upstream market as an application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suga et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: