In vitro analysis shows enhanced antibacterial efficacy in premolars with Neem extracts, suggesting effective orthodontic adhesive use.
Purpose Orthodontic appliances promote plaque accumulation, enamel demineralization, and bacterial adhesion, increasing the risk of tooth decay. Integrating antimicrobial agents into orthodontic adhesives offers a potential solution. Neem (Azadirachta indica), known for its antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties, may inhibit bacterial colonization when incorporated into orthodontic primers. This study evaluates the antibacterial efficacy, shear bond strength (SBS), and adhesive remnant index (ARI) of Neem-infused Transbond XT (TXT) primers compared to conventional formulations.Materials and Methods Ethanolic Neem extract was prepared and added to TXT primer at 2%, 4% and 6% concentrations. Sixty extracted premolars were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 15 each): a control group using unmodified TXT primer and three experimental groups with modified primer at different Neem concentrations. Brackets were bonded following a standardized protocol, and SBS was assessed using a universal testing machine. Antibacterial efficacy against Streptococcus mutans was evaluated using a disc agar diffusion assay, while ARI scores were determined post-debonding using stereomicroscopy. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test were applied for statistical analysis (p < 0.05).Results The 6% Neem-modified primer exhibited the highest antibacterial efficacy (17.43 ± 1.36 mm zone of inhibition, p < 0.05). However, SBS decreased with increasing Neem concentration, with the 6% formulation showing the lowest SBS (7.80 ± 1.09 MPa). ARI scores indicated moderate adhesive retention across experimental groups.Conclusion Neem-modified orthodontic primers enhance antibacterial efficacy but compromise SBS. The 4% Neem concentration provides the best balance between bacterial inhibition and bond strength.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Munot et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: