Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review highlights that targeted therapies reduce respiratory infection risk in allergic disease patients, suggesting potential benefits for immune rebalancing and epithelial integrity restoration.
Purpose of review To summarize the effects of type 2 (T2) cytokine–targeting therapies on respiratory infection risk in patients with allergic diseases, with a focus on the interplay between epithelial barrier restoration and immune rebalancing. Recent findings T2 inflammation, driven by IL-4, IL-13, IL-5, and IgE, disrupts epithelial integrity and impairs mucosal defenses, increasing susceptibility to infections. Biologics targeting these pathways restore barrier function and modulate immune responses, promoting Th1/Th17-mediated antimicrobial activity. Dupilumab improves epithelial integrity and Th1/Th17 activity, with post hoc analyses from QUEST and SINUS-52 showing fewer respiratory infections compared to placebo. IL-13-specific therapies (tralokinumab, lebrikizumab) reduce excessive Th2 signaling and effector T-cell transdifferentiation, supporting mucosal homeostasis and low infection rates. IL-5-targeted biologics (mepolizumab, benralizumab) decrease eosinophil-mediated tissue injury without significantly increasing respiratory infections, despite theoretical concerns regarding antiviral defense. Omalizumab enhances Th1 antiviral pathways while reducing IgE-mediated inflammation, preserving infection control. Summary T2-modulating biologics not only control allergic inflammation but also restore epithelial and immune homeostasis, contributing to maintained or reduced respiratory infection risk. These therapies represent a dual benefit of barrier repair and immune rebalancing. Further studies are warranted to evaluate long-term infection outcomes in high-risk populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smiley et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: