Analysis reveals emissions factors in hard coal production, indicating economic cost is ineffective for consumable cut-off criteria.
Accurate carbon footprint quantification for hard coal products is essential for the development of low-carbon and sustainable supply chain emissions management. A significant challenge lies in handling the numerous auxiliary consumables used in mining, whose contributions to upstream emissions are often unclear. This study addresses this gap by calculating the cradle-to-gate carbon footprint of hard coal from typical surface and underground mines in China using a life cycle assessment. Confronted with the challenge of accounting for thousands of consumable types, this study demonstrates that economic cost is an ineffective criterion for identifying high-impact items. In contrast, consumable weight shows a strong correlation with emissions and provides a robust basis for cut-off decisions. CFP quantification results obtained using this method show that upstream emissions from other auxiliary consumables (OACs), except for fuel and explosives, account for a significant proportion of the total CFP: 1.64 ± 0.50% (1.02 ± 0.31 kg CO2e/t) in a surface mine and 11.63 ± 3.17% (2.91 ± 0.87 kg CO2e/t) in an underground mine. Based on three years of requisition data and an emission analysis, a reference list of the OACs that need to be included is provided, which can serve as a reference for determining the cut-off criteria for and system boundary of the carbon footprint of hard coal products and thus promote the better development of sustainable supply chains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: