Parametric study shows that bleed improves pressure recovery and swirl metrics in external compression intakes.
Flow quality at the engine face, especially total pressure recovery and swirl, is central to the performance and stability of external compression supersonic inlets. Steady-state RANS-based numerical computations are performed to quantify bleed/swirl trade-offs in a single-ramp intake. The CFD simulations were performed first without a bleed system over M∞ = 1.4–1.9 to locate the practical onset of a bleed requirement. The deterioration in pressure recovery and swirl beyond M∞ ≈ 1.6, which is consistent with a pre-shock strength near the turbulent separation threshold, motivated the use of a bleed system. The comparisons with and without the bleed system were performed next at M∞ = 1.6, 1.8, and 1.9 across the operation map parameterized by the flow ratio. The CFD simulations were performed using ANSYS Fluent, with a pressure-based coupled solver with a realizable k-ε turbulence model and enhanced wall treatment. The results provide engine-face distortion metrics using a standardized ring to sector swirl ratio alongside pressure recovery. The results show that bleed removes low-momentum near-wall fluid and stabilizes the terminal–shock interaction, raising pressure recovery and lowering peak swirl and swirl intensity across the map, while extending the stable operating range to a lower flow ratio at a fixed M∞. The analysis delivers a design-oriented linkage between shock/boundary-layer interaction control and swirl: when bleed is applied at and above M∞ = 1.6, the separation footprints shrink and the organized swirl sectors weaken, yielding improved operability with modest bleed fractions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muhammed Enes Özcan (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: