Experiments reveal significant effects of model parameters on p-values and sample sizes in car parking data analysis, suggesting careful parameter selection is crucial.
This study investigates the impact of design decisions on the outcomes of chi-squared tests when applied to Poisson distributions, using the practical example of arrivals in a parking garage. Through a combination of experiments and simulations, we found that variations in modeling parameters, such as interval length, observation period, and the number of classes, significantly influence the p -values of the chi-squared test. Specifically, increasing interval lengths resulted in reduced sample sizes and greater variance in the average number of events, λ λ , leading to lower p -values and contrasting previous findings from the literature. Furthermore, we find that biases, such as those arising from disruptions like COVID-19 lockdowns, have a smaller impact than anticipated, whereas sample size is a dominant factor, with larger samples consistently producing lower p -values. Our results highlight the susceptibility of chi-squared tests to parameter choices, emphasizing the risk of misleading conclusions when testing the fit of a Poisson distribution. We recommend that practitioners carefully select model parameters to avoid false claims of statistical significance and urge reviewers to critically assess test setups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Müller et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: