Corrosion testing shows improved resistance of cladded carbon steel in geothermal fluid, indicating cladding can enhance lifespan.
Carbon steel casing material in high-temperature deep geothermal wells can be prone to severe corrosion and premature failure due to the oxidation capacity of H2O, H2S, CO2, and more corrosive species in geothermal fluid. Due to the higher temperature and pressure and phase state of fluid in high-temperature deep geothermal wells, the rate and extent of corrosion can be expected to be different than in low-temperature geothermal wells. To reduce the extent of corrosion damage and corrosion rate, and increase the lifetime of geothermal wells, one mitigation method is to clad the internal surface of the geothermal casing with a more noble, corrosion-resistant material. Conventional cladding, however, has been an expensive and time-consuming process up to the current date, but recently, a more economical and productive method has been established, i.e., EHLA cladding. In this study, a 14-day corrosion performance test was conducted on stainless steel and nickel-based alloy clads on a carbon steel substrate in a 262 °C and 95 bar geothermal well in the Hellisheidi geothermal field (SW Iceland). Samples were partially or fully cladded, and some samples were stressed to investigate the clads’ susceptibility to general corrosion and stress corrosion cracking, as well as the substrate’s vulnerability to galvanic corrosion. Corrosion analysis of pure carbon steel substrate was also investigated for comparison. Samples were microstructurally analysed with SEM, and chemical analysis was performed with EDX. The results indicated that the clad materials have good corrosion resistance in the geothermal environment tested, suggesting that EHLA cladding is a more feasible option for strengthening the corrosion resistance of geothermal casing and equipment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Þórhallsson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: