Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective cohort study identifies two molecular subgroups predicting laryngeal cancer recurrence, suggesting improved prognostic strategies.
The aim of this study was to test whether intratumoral heterogeneity explains inconsistent reports on VEGF-A as a prognostic marker in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) and to identify expression phenotypes (mRNA/miRNA) associated with recurrence. In a prospective cohort of 60 T3/T4 LSCC patients undergoing primary laryngectomy, we sampled four regions per case (tumor surface, tumor depth, peritumoral mucosa ≤1 cm, paired distant normal mucosa). mRNA levels of HIF-1α/2α/3α, VEGF-A, VEGFR1/2, and ETS-1 were quantified by RT-qPCR; cohort-matched miRNA profiling (microarray with RT-qPCR validation) was integrated. Elevated VEGF-A at tumor depth predicted recurrence (log-rank p = 0.0001), while surface VEGF-A had no prognostic value (p = 0.170). Pairwise testing confirmed higher VEGF-A at depth versus surface (Wilcoxon p = 0.026). A subgroup with depth VEGF-A RQ > 2 and HIF-1α RQ < 2 showed a 64% recurrence rate. An independent subgroup defined by high miR-93-5p/miR-144-3p/miR-210-3p expression also had significantly worse outcomes. The two subgroups were non-overlapping in most patients and accounted for 76% of recurrences. The prognostic relevance of VEGF-A in LSCC is region-dependent, with clinically meaningful value confined to tumor depth. Together with a high-risk three-miRNA signature, these findings delineate two molecular subgroups capturing most recurrences and may inform sampling strategies and risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Popov et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: