This analysis uses X-ray computed tomography to quantify sedimentary variability in core samples, suggesting improved characterization methods and sampling design.
Reconstructing past environments requires accurate interpretation of sedimentary variability in cores. Identifying features such as grain-size and compositional changes is essential for understanding depositional processes, but surface-based observations and point measurements may miss internal heterogeneity, affecting sampling representativeness. X-ray computed tomography (CT) provides a non-destructive approach to visualizing internal structures based on X-ray attenuation. While CT has been widely adopted in sedimentological studies, many applications remain qualitative and dependent on interpreter experience. This study introduces a framework integrating multiple CT-derived parameters, applied to sediment cores from Dapeng Bay, southwestern Taiwan. CT intensity values were classified into six attenuation-based regions of interest (ROIs), and parameters including volume fraction, statistical metrics (mean, coefficient of variation), and morphological descriptors (mean particle thickness of selected ROIs) were extracted on a slice-by-slice basis. These parameters were integrated to produce the high-resolution (~ 100 μm) vertical profiles that capture internal textural variability. The results demonstrate how CT-based metrics can support visual core description by quantitatively delineating sedimentary structures, improving sampling design, and enabling systematic comparison between cores. Together, these advances yield a novel, parameter-based quantitative framework that offers a reproducible, three-dimensionally informed workflow for the numerical reading of full-core CT volumes, remains transferable across settings through CT-parameter initialization and refinement, and provides a foundation for future data-driven classification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: