Cross-sectional analysis reveals barriers like financial constraints and unavailability hindering filter-needle use by nurses.
Background: Filter needle use is a vital safety measure to prevent glass particle contamination during medication preparation from ampoules. Although international recommendations emphasize their importance, filter needles are rarely used consistently in resource-limited settings, exposing patients to risks such as embolism, inflammation, and infection caused by glass particle injection. Aim: The study assessed nurses’ knowledge of filter-needle use, identified barriers to implementation, explored strategies, and provided recommendations to promote safe medication practices at LAUTECH Teaching Hospital, Ogbomoso. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional design was employed with data collected from 145 registered nurses selected through stratified sampling across 12 wards and 5 clinics in the hospital. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and organized and analyzed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS v27. Descriptive statistics summarized responses, while Chi-square tests determined associations at a significance level of p < 0.05. Results: Most nurses (95.9%) recognized the importance of filter needles, and 91.7% understood their clinical indications. However, only 57.2% reported confidence in practical use. Reported barriers included unavailability (100%), heavy workload (93.1%), lack of training (87.6%), absence of institutional policy (100%), and financial constraints (81.4%). Knowledge was significantly associated with financial limitations (χ² = 98.044, p < 0.001) but not with sociodemographic factors (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Nurses demonstrate strong theoretical knowledge but limited confidence and practice due to systemic barriers. Institutional reform, including policy mandates, regular training, and resource allocation, is urgently required to enhance safe medication practices
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agboola et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: