Analysis reveals altered proton–coupled electron transfer mechanisms with different redox potentials and proton affinities in polyoxometalates, indicating complex catalytic behavior.
The design of H‐atom transfer catalysts requires the control of redox potential and proton affinity to direct the mechanism, rate, and selectivity of proton–coupled electron transfer (PCET). In the present study, we demonstrate that a series of reduced and protonated vanadium‐substituted Keggin‐type polyoxotungstates ([XVW 11 O 39 (OH)] n– , X = Si, n = 5; X = P, n = 4; X = S, n = 3), exhibit invariant bond dissociation free energies of surface O─H bonds (BDFE(O─H)s). Despite uniform driving forces for H‐atom uptake, kinetic analysis with a variety of H‐atom donors (5,10‐dihydrophenazine, hydrazobenzene, and hydroquinones) reveals differences in rates of substrate oxidation, which are ascribed to disparate PCET mechanisms. Together, these findings show that substitution at the central heteroatom tunes the electron‐ and proton‐transfer driving forces (Δ G PT and Δ G ET ) thereby dictating the operative PCET mechanism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lü et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: