Proposed technology demonstrates systematic review and meta-analysis to enhance design in enterprise architecture and optimize electronic equipment production.
Before conducting many scientific studies, one pays insufficient attention to substantiating the relevance of their topics. Nevertheless, this is a guarantee of minimizing the resources of the scientific community for advancing science, excluding duplicate research, and broadening the accepted basis for continuing studies. In the information society, resources and technologies have emerged that allow making this process more dynamic and reliable. The authors propose a technology for focused search and analysis of conducted research results based on the PRISMA approach. The work provides an example of forming a systematic review and conducting meta-analysis of results to justify the relevance of the scientific problem of industrial enterprise architecture design; shows that this problem can be effectively solvable only with the optimal enterprise architecture. Analyzing publications under the query “Enterprise Architecture” allows concluding that the main aspects of building enterprise architecture are quite fully representful. Based on a systematic approach, a consistent architecture aligned with the mission and strategy of the enterprise can be constructed, but it is impossible to guarantee whether this solution is the most effective. Publications dedicated to building optimal enterprise architectures are virtually nonexistent. The paper proposes a method for formalizing the process of building enterprise architecture and optimizing this process; considers optimization applications of modeling of enterprises engaged in electronic equipment production and other industries; represents additionally, developing this technology and integrating the approach to addressing issues of comprehensive security in enterprise architecture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2025 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: