Systematic review highlights sustainable management and resource recovery challenges in waste agricultural film treatment technologies.
The mechanized processing of waste agricultural film is a crucial technical pathway for addressing agricultural-film pollution. Achieving resource recovery through mechanized waste-film processing—and thereby promoting the sustainable management of agricultural-film pollution—remains a major challenge for green agricultural development. This study systematically reviews the progress and limitations of shredding and film–impurity separation technologies deployed in China’s mechanized waste-film treatment. Based on multi-database searches and citation tracking of the literature published between 2000 and 2025, it comparatively evaluates key unit operations, including cutterhead/blade kinematics, specific energy-consumption (SEC) control, and airflow (air-classification) separation, complemented by engineering analyses of representative machinery. The findings indicate that integrated mechanized recovery lines have become the mainstream approach, although the recovered fraction still contains a high impurity load. Drum-type and shear-type shredding exhibit trade-offs between energy efficiency and mitigation of film wrapping/entanglement. Airflow separation and drum-screen or vibrating-screen modules show reduced separation efficiency and process stability at high moisture contents or when impurities have particle sizes comparable to the film; system complexity and maintenance burdens also warrant consideration. To address these issues, a process framework is proposed that integrates drum pre-crushing, shear fine shredding, air classification, and multi-stage screening, together with variable-frequency drive (VFD) speed control, torque monitoring, and modular design, providing a sustainable pathway for the clean separation and resource recovery of agricultural plastic film waste.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: