Novel degradable materials enhance oil/water separation performance in extreme conditions, suggesting advancements in surface engineering may lead to sustainable solutions.
The development of oil–water separation materials that combine high separation efficiency, robust mechanical properties, and environmental degradability remains a significant challenge. This study presents a novel degradable and superhydrophobic porous material fabricated via a multi-step process. A porous foam was first synthesized from degradable poly(ε-caprolactone-co-2-ethylhexyl acrylate) using a high internal phase emulsion templating technique. The foam was subsequently modified through in situ silica (SiO2) deposition via a sol–gel process, followed by grafting with hydrophobic hexadecyltrimethoxysilane (HDTMS) to produce the final oil–water separation porous materials. Various characterization results showed that the optimized material featured a hierarchical pore structure in micro scales and the porosity of the foam remained ~90% even after the 2-step modification. Mechanical tests indicate that the modified material exhibited significantly enhanced compressive strength and the water contact angle measurements revealed a superhydrophobic surface with a value of approximately 156°. The prepared material demonstrated excellent oil/water separation performance with notable absorption capacities ranging from 4.11 to 4.90 g/g for oils with different viscosity. Additionally, the porous material exhibited exceptional cyclic stability, maintaining over 90% absorption capacity after 10 absorption-desorption cycles. Moreover, the prepared material achieved a mass loss of approximately 30% within the first 3 days under alkaline hydrolysis conditions (pH 12, 25 °C), which further escalated to ~70% degradation within four weeks. The current work establishes a feasible strategy for developing sustainable, high-performance oil–water separation materials through rational structural design and surface engineering.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: