Immunoassays utilizing platinum nanoparticles exhibit 74% sensitivity and 100% specificity for SARS-CoV-2, highlighting their diagnostic accuracy.
Background: Rapid and high-throughput diagnostic methods are essential for controlling the spread of infectious diseases, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) strips provide a cost-effective and user-friendly platform for point-of-care testing. However, the sensitivity of conventional LFIA kits is often limited by the performance of their detection probes. This study reports a highly sensitive LFIA strip for detecting the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (NP) protein using platinum-decorated poly(2-vinylpyridine) nanoparticles (Pt-P2VPs) as probes. Methods: Monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 NP were conjugated with Pt-P2VPs and incorporated into LFIA strips. The test line was coated with anti–SARS-CoV-2 NP monoclonal antibody, and the control line with goat anti-mouse IgG. Recombinant proteins, viral strains, and nasopharyngeal swab specimens from patients were used to evaluate assay performance, with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using nonparametric statistical tests. Results: Pt-P2VP-based LFIA strips enabled sensitive detection of recombinant NP and inactivated SARS-CoV-2, with minimal cross-reactivity. In 200 clinical specimens (100 PCR-negative and 100 PCR-positive), the assay achieved 74% sensitivity and 100% specificity, with strong correlation to viral RNA load. Compared with conventional LFIA kits, Pt-P2VP strips demonstrated superior sensitivity at lower viral loads. Conclusions: Pt-P2VPs represent a promising probe material for enhancing LFIA performance and may facilitate the development of rapid, sensitive, and scalable immunoassays for infectious disease diagnostics in biomedical applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kimura et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: