Prospective analysis shows preservative-free travoprost lowers intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma, suggesting better ocular surface health with increased tolerability.
Background: The present study assesses the effectiveness and tolerability of preservative-free travoprost in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), focusing on intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction and ocular surface health over a six-month period. Methods: The study was prospectively designed and conducted at the University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Greece. A total of 45 patients diagnosed with either POAG or ocular hypertension (OHT) were included in the study; all were either newly diagnosed or had previously discontinued prostaglandin therapy due to intolerance. Of these, 39 participants completed the study. All subjects were administered preservative-free travoprost once daily. Clinical evaluations were conducted at baseline (T0), and at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T3), 6 months (T6) and 12 months (T12) following treatment initiation. The primary outcomes encompassed reductions in intraocular pressure (IOP), Schirmer test values, tear break-up time (TBUT), conjunctival hyperemia, as well as measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness. Visual field parameters were also assessed. Results: A significant reduction in IOP was observed at T1, T3, T6 and T12 compared to baseline (p < 0.01). Schirmer test scores improved significantly from T0 to all subsequent time points (p < 0.01). Conjunctival hyperemia decreased significantly across follow-ups, while TBUT showed no significant change (p > 0.05). No significant changes were noted in mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), RNFL, or GCC thickness over six months. Conclusion: Preservative-free travoprost effectively reduces IOP while improving ocular surface health, particularly in tear production and conjunctival hyperemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bakirtzis et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: