This meta-analysis finds a large effect size between self-efficacy and self-regulated learning in university students, indicating implications for digital learning interventions.
The success of students in digital learning depends largely on internal psychological factors such as self-efficacy and self-regulated learning (SRL). However, the strength and consistency of the relationship between these two constructs vary across studies. This meta-analysis synthesizes findings from seven empirical studies (total N = 1,971) published between 2020 and 2024 to estimate the magnitude of the relationship between self-efficacy and SRL among university students in digital learning contexts. Data were analyzed using the Sidik–Jonkman estimator model in Jamovi. Results revealed a large and significant overall effect size (r = 0.66, p < .001; 95% CI [0.29, 1.03]) with high heterogeneity (I² = 97.6%, Q = 221.73, p < .001). Publication bias analysis indicated no significant bias (Egger’s regression test p = .896; Fail-safe N = 1,861). This study extends previous correlational research by providing quantitative evidence on the robustness of the link between self-efficacy and SRL specifically in digital learning environments. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of how students’ confidence in their learning abilities supports the development of effective self-regulation strategies, thereby informing future interventions to enhance digital learning outcomes in higher education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Priyambodo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: