Modeling respiratory infections in Sudan shows that SETAR outperformed SARIMA, suggesting effective public health interventions are needed.
We examine quarterly respiratory infection data (2013–2024) from Red Sea State, Sudan, and identify a regime shift in Q1-2018 from low to consistently high transmission levels. We evaluate SARIMA and self-exciting threshold autoregressive (SETAR) models for standard forecasting, comparing them to early warning systems. A SARIMA(1,1,1)(1,1,0)[_4] model accounts for seasonality but exhibits a delayed response to sudden fluctuations. A two-regime SETAR with a delay of d = 1 establishes a clinically significant threshold at 150 instances per quarter; surpassing this threshold initiates a high-persistence phase with an AR(1) coefficient of 0.89 (a half-life of approximately 6 quarters). In the 2024 hold-out testing, SETAR outperformed SARIMA with an RMSE of 14.7 compared to 18.2, an MAE of 12.3 versus 15.6, and a MAPE of 3.0% versus 3.8%. We advocate for the use of SARIMA for regular seasonal forecasts and SETAR as a notification mechanism that activates public health interventions when the number of cases surpasses the 150-case threshold. Priorities encompass transitioning to monthly reporting and incorporating exogenous variables (e.g., climate, mobility). This dual-model methodology is pragmatic, comprehensible, and appropriate for resource-constrained surveillance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qurashi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: