Analysis underscores how emotion regulation strategies enhance cognitive functions and adaptive behavior in mental health.
Emotion regulation research has focused on mental health outcomes, such as emotional recovery and wellbeing reinstatement, in behavioral, physiological and neural measures across different regulatory strategies for decades. Albeit important, the practical significance of emotion regulation research should not only be limited to mental health, but also needs to consider aiding people’s real-time adaptive behavior, to meet varying environmental demands or goals flexibly. In this paper, we propose an idea of emotion regulation adaptiveness that pay equal attention to both mental health outcomes, and how ER strategy may be used to facilitate humans’ functional adaptiveness in meeting distinct goals. For instance, research of ER adaptiveness needs to highlight how to design regulatory strategies for the purpose of promoting cognitive, behavior or social functions (nonaffective goal) in addition to that of affective wellbeing, and how to help a learned strategy work flexibly in changing contexts(affective goal). Lastly, taking application in sport psychology for example, we propose potential directions of how ER adaptiveness research may help players to improve motor performance in competitive sports.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: