Evidence-based practices improved learner confidence in trauma-informed care, suggesting better patient interactions and self-care.
Introduction Trauma impacts health; the adverse health effects of trauma are well-understood and trauma-informed care is recommended to mitigate these effects. There is an opportunity to leverage evidence-based frameworks to add to the growing body of literature on teaching trauma-informed care within undergraduate medical education. To address this, we developed, implemented, and evaluated the Presence 5 for Trauma Informed Care Workshop (P5 TIC), a discussion-based workshop, informed by evidence and guided by a clinical case, to teach tangible trauma-informed care practices in undergraduate medical education. Methods P5 TIC was developed by abstracting practices from a narrative literature review and mapping them to the Presence 5 framework. Evidence-based practices informed the development of a 1-hour, in-person workshop comprising didactics followed by a case-based discussion. P5 TIC was implemented with undergraduate medical students ( n = 144) through the Practice of Medicine Course. Participants completed a pre- and post-workshop survey to evaluate confidence and attitudes related to trauma informed care. Results Literature review resulted in the following P5 TIC practices: (1) Prepare with Intention (e.g., chart review mindfully) (2), Listen Intently and Completely (e.g., listen for signs and impacts of trauma when your patient is ready to share) (3) , Agree on What Matters Most (e.g., prioritize your patient’s trauma-related medical needs) (4), Connect with the Patient’s Story (e.g., reflect on how trauma intersects with healthcare) (5), Explore Emotional Cues (e.g., tune into body language and non-verbal cues), and (6)Care for Yourself (e.g., practice compassionate detachment). Learner confidence and attitudes related to trauma informed care increased after participation in P5 TIC. Conclusion P5 TIC is a structured, evidence-based approach to teaching trauma informed care and adds to the literature in providing tangible practices as well as addressing self-care. Further medical education research should be conducted to explore the impact of P5 TIC on learner and patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
King et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: