Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dynamic Bayesian network analysis demonstrates a 71.9% reduction in fire occurrence probability, highlighting fire safety in subway systems.
Subway stations are enclosed spaces with high passenger density and complex evacuation conditions. Fires in such environments can escalate rapidly and cause severe consequences. This study proposes a dynamic risk assessment model grounded in dual symmetries. The first symmetry is a balanced “Human–Machine–Environment–Management” analytical structure. The second is a coherent model transformation from a Fault Tree (FT) to a Bayesian Network (BN). Shuanggang Station on Nanchang Metro Line 1 serves as a case study. This work establishes a comprehensive evaluation system based on 4 first-level indicators of man–machine–environment–management, 9 secondary indicators, and 27 tertiary indicators. FT analysis identified 117 minimal cuts and 14 minimal paths, pinpointing core risk nodes such as flammable materials and oxidizers, electrical equipment overheating, and fire management deficiencies. The model was then symmetrically converted into a BN using GeNle Academic 4.1 software to support dynamic probability inference. The results show that prevention measures at Shuanggang Station reduce the fire occurrence probability from 0.000249 to 0.00007 (a 71.9% reduction). The probability importance of rescue escape routes is 0.00223. This indicates that the accessibility of rescue routes constitutes a highly sensitive hazard. The symmetric framework and modeling approach offer a scientific basis for targeted fire prevention, control, and evacuation management in the Nanchang Metro and similar stations. The findings support improvements in the safety and resilience of metro operations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: