Simulations demonstrate turbulence modelling methods impact cavitation in hydrofoils, indicating a need for improved predictions.
The performance of various turbulence modelling methods for simulating cavitating flow over a hydrofoil was investigated. VOF mixture modelling was applied for the multiphase flow, along with a standard two-equation turbulence model, a hybrid RANS-LES method, and a wall-modeled LES approach. The simulations were conducted in a numerical cavitation tank with experimental data available for a range of Reynolds numbers and cavitation conditions. A Reboud damping for eddy viscosity was applied (hereafter referred to as SST-R). A less common approach, incorporating interfacial turbulence damping based on physical arguments regarding the wall-like behavior of phase interfaces, was also applied (referred to here as SST-D). Our results indicate that the standard RANS method fails to predict the breakdown of lift with decreasing cavitation numbers, a phenomenon observed in the experiments and in earlier studies. Incorporating turbulence damping at the cavity interface or directly on the eddy viscosity improves predictions for both URANS and hybrid RANS-LES methods. Both the SST-D and SST-R agreed well with available experimental data, and the LES method consistently provided accurate results across all numerical grids.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Viitanen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: