Diallel analysis reveals genetic variation in grain yield and heterosis among barley cultivars, indicating potential for enhanced agricultural productivity.
Developing high-yielding cultivars requires understanding genetic variation in yield and its components. The study aimed to investigate the genetic structure and inheritance of key traits to identify suitable parents and promising hybrid combinations across F₁-F₄ generations, using a randomized complete block design with three replications (2019-2023). Data analysis included Griffing Method I, Model 1, general combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) analysis, full diallel variance analysis, Jinks-Hayman diallel hybrid analysis, and heterosis-heterobeltiosis ratios. The Arcanda cultivar showed strong general combining ability, while the Arcanda/Asparuh and Alena/Asparuh hybrid combinations exhibited significant specific combining ability. In the F₁-F₄ evaluations, Arcanda × Asparuh achieved the highest yields (30.43 g plant⁻¹; 340.40 g 1 m⁻¹; 8500.0 and 9151.0 kg ha⁻¹), with mean heterosis and heterobeltiosis values of 37.32% and 23.07%, respectively. Alena × Asparuh also performed strongly, particularly in F₃ (8459.0 kg ha⁻¹), and exhibited high heterosis in F₁. High heterosis and heterobeltiosis values, especially for grain yield and thousand kernel weight indicate substantial potential for genetic improvement. To assess the kinship of the parental lines, iPBS-retrotransposon primers were used. The Alena and Arcanda cultivars showed 78% similarity, while the Asparuh cultivar showed 71% similarity to the other parents. In conclusion, Arcanda × Asparuh and Alena × Asparuh consistently combined high yield with genetic stability, making them strong candidates for breeding high-performing barley cultivars. Delaying selection to the later F₃-F₄ generations increases the accuracy of identifying and stabilizing superior hybrids, thereby maximizing genetic potential and enhancing agricultural productivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Türkoğlu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: