Numerical study shows glaciogenic seeding with silver iodide enhances precipitation via ice nucleation in stratocumulus clouds, indicating variable responses due to supercooled water.
Stratocumulus clouds are cloud systems composed of stratiform clouds with embedded convective clouds, possessing strong catalytic potential and serving as key target cloud systems for weather modification operations. In this study, the parameterization of ice nucleation for silver iodide (AgI) particles was applied to the Thompson microphysics scheme in the WRF model. Numerical experiments were designed for a stratocumulus cloud that occurred over the Hulunbuir region, northeastern China, on 31 May 2021, to investigate how the structure and evolution of cloud macro- and microphysical properties and precipitation formation respond to glaciogenic seeding. The simulation results indicate that AgI nucleation increased ice concentrations at 4–5 km altitude, enhancing ice crystal formation through condensation–freezing and deposition nucleation and the growth of ice particles through auto-conversion and riming, leading to increased precipitation. The results also show that owing to the non-uniform distribution of supercooled water within this stratocumulus cloud system, the consumption of AgI and the enhanced ice nucleation release latent heat more strongly in regions with higher supercooled water content. This leads to more pronounced isolated updrafts, altering the structure of shear lines and subsequently influencing regional precipitation distribution after silver iodide seeding concludes. These findings reveal that seeding influences both the microphysical and dynamic structures within clouds and highlight the non-uniform seeding effects within cloud systems. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the effects of artificial seeding on stratocumulus clouds in high-latitude regions and holds significant reference value for artificial weather modification efforts in mixed-phase stratiform clouds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: