Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis reveals ethical issues in AI use in nephrology, suggesting solutions for accountability, trustworthiness, and patient privacy.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) promises significant advancements in nephrology. While current use of AI in clinical nephrology practice is limited, there is scope for application in areas such as transplant allocation, remote dialysis monitoring and CKD management. Yet, despite its potential, the use of AI in nephrology raises important ethical issues. Challenges include concerns about trustworthiness and reliability of AI systems, accountability for inaccurate results, injustice from the perpetuation or exacerbation of individual and systemic biases and inequities, and risks to patient privacy arising from the need for AI to access to sensitive health data. Additionally, there are unresolved questions about the application of current disclosure and informed consent practices for patients when AI is used in their care, and about the environmental and sustainability impact of this energy-hungry technology in an already resource intensive specialty. This article explores these ethical challenges and gives recommendations for addressing them, both at an individual clinician and healthcare system level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weightman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: