Observational analysis reveals that fractal dimension influences gas storage in tight sandstones, suggesting clay minerals impact reservoir connectivity.
Pore–throat structure and gas distribution are critical factors in evaluating the quality of tight sandstone reservoirs and hydrocarbon resource potential. Twelve tight sandstone samples from the Lower Permian Shihezi Formation in Hangjin Banner, Ordos Basin, were selected for CTS, X-ray diffraction, HPMI, and gas displacement NMR analyses. By converting the T2 spectra into pore–throat distributions and applying fractal methods, we quantitatively analyzed the influences of multiple factors on gas distribution characteristics across different pore–throat sizes. The main results are as follows: All samples exhibit a three-stage pore–throat distribution, defining mesopores, micropores, and nanopores; quartz content mainly influences the fractal dimension of mesopores by enhancing structural stability and gas storage capacity, whereas clay minerals control the fractal characteristics of nanopores by increasing pore–throat complexity. An increase in clay mineral content increases the fractal dimension, indicating stronger reservoir heterogeneity and consequently poorer gas-bearing capacity. Larger pore–throat parameters (Rm, Sk, and Smax) correspond to lower fractal dimensions, indicating better connectivity and greater gas storage capacity. Among these factors, pore–throat parameters exert the most significant influence on the fractal dimensions of mesopores and micropores, jointly determining the overall connectivity and the upper limit of the reservoir’s gas-bearing capacity. The results demonstrate that larger pore–throat parameters and higher quartz content help reduce the fractal dimension and enhance the gas-bearing capacity of tight reservoirs. This research enhances understanding of pore–throat structures and gas-bearing capacity in low-permeability reservoirs and provides a theoretical basis for exploration, development, and enhanced recovery in the study area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: