Longitudinal population study shows frailty and grip strength linked to dementia risk in 9,940 adults, indicating critical biomarkers are involved.
Background While previous research has demonstrated that frailty is associated with increased dementia risk over time, large multi-decade prospective population-based cohort studies remain limited. Furthermore, the association between lower grip strength and blood-based biomarkers of neuropathology and global cognitive function remains under-investigated. Methods We investigated the relationship between varying levels of baseline frailty (measured using a deficit accumulation Frailty Index) and dementia incidence over 17 years, as well as associations of grip strength (hand, pinch and key, assessed at 8- and 14-year follow-up) with blood-based biomarkers of neuropathology (year 8) and with global cognitive function (year 14) in a population-representative cohort of 9,940 mid-to-late life (50-75 years) individuals. Results In a subsample of 6,357 participants with available dementia information at 17-year follow-up (mean age at baseline [SD], 61.7 [6.6] years; female, 54.3%), 516 received an all-cause dementia diagnosis. Over this time, individuals in the highest frailty index quintile demonstrated a significantly higher risk of all-cause dementia (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.18-2.60) and a vascular dementia diagnosis (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.22-4.91). Cross-sectionally, lower handgrip strength was associated with elevated blood levels of NfL (β=-0.01, p=0.007) and pTau181 (β=-0.004, p=0.017) at 8-year follow-up, as well as poorer cognitive function on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (β = 0.02, p=0.037) at 14-year follow-up. Conclusions This study strengthens evidence that frailty is a risk factor for dementia in mid-to-late life. It also suggests that it is of considerable importance to assess frailty and grip strength in individuals ‘at risk’ of cognitive decline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michaelian et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: