In The Differend, postmodern philosopher Jean-François Lyotard presents a communicative theory of conflict. Lyotard terms the element of conflict in society the differend. Here, I propose to approach this difficult concept via anti-humanism. In the first section of this article, I connect the concepts of the differend, language games, and anti-humanism. Lyotard's post-anthropocentric view of discourse as autonomous and self-organizing is the foundational premise of his social thought. In the second section of my article, I bridge the concepts of anti-humanism and the proposed extinction of philosophy, arguing that if anthropocentric critique is obsolete, then a new kind of politics is necessary. In the third section, I conceive of Lyotard’s communicative vision of society as one that accounts for the increasingly automated nature of social systems. In the concluding section, I apply Christian Baier's concepts of "epistemic spheres" and "epistemic differend" to analyze contemporary political polarization, while also engaging critically with Eric Goodfield's recent critique of Lyotard’s perceived liberalism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ádám Lovász (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: