This article reveals how narratives influence risk perception and objectivity in risk studies, guiding policymakers and analysts.
Recent literature has examined the role of misinformation, biases, and other factors in contributing to the integrity of a risk study. These types of social and cognitive dynamics—referred to as narratives—comprise concern and value in a risk study. These narratives may appear to undermine aspects of objectivity in a scientific sense, but they may also shed light on aspects of a risk study that involve perceived scientific truths, related risk concerns, and values. The narratives can inform overall risk perception and the perception of quality for the risk study. As a result, understanding and classifying those narratives provides additional evidence that can potentially inform decisions for the design and implementation of a risk study. In this article, we develop a classification system that can be used to understand and address narratives that can influence a risk study and how various stakeholders perceive the risk study. This article will be of interest to risk analysts, policymakers, and risk communicators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thekdi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: