Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Commentary proposes narrative trust framework for enhancing public trust in science communication.
Storytelling is often presented as a solution to problems of trust in science communication. Yet stories can attract attention without making science credible, meaningful, or legitimate. This commentary proposes narrative trust as a theoretical perspective for explaining when stories support public trust. Narrative trust emerges when four conditions align: intelligibility, credibility, cultural resonance, and legitimacy of mediation. The framework shifts attention from whether stories “work” to the communicative conditions under which science becomes understandable, believable, socially meaningful, and publicly actionable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inti Josue Cachipuendo-Contero (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: