This analysis reveals properties of the S-second classical S-Zariski topology in modules, highlighting separation axioms and irreducibility.
Let [Formula: see text] be a commutative ring with identity, [Formula: see text] be a multiplicatively closed subset of [Formula: see text]. A submodule [Formula: see text] of an [Formula: see text]-module [Formula: see text] with ann[Formula: see text] is said to be an [Formula: see text]-second submodule if there exists a fixed [Formula: see text], and whenever [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] is a submodule of [Formula: see text], we have either [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text]. The set of all [Formula: see text]-second submodules of an [Formula: see text]-module [Formula: see text] wil be called [Formula: see text]-second spectrum of [Formula: see text] and denoted by [Formula: see text]-[Formula: see text]. In this paper, we construct and investigate a topology on [Formula: see text]-[Formula: see text] which we will call [Formula: see text]-second classical [Formula: see text]-Zariski topology. We examine separation axioms, compactness, connectedness and irreducibility of this topological space. We also investigate [Formula: see text]-second classical [Formula: see text]-Zariski topology from the point of view spectral spaces by using Hochster’s characterization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
YILMAZ et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: