Analysis demonstrates estimation of EDA-based arousal via LiDAR in drivers, indicating potential for user safety enhancement.
Driver monitoring systems are increasingly relying on physiological signals to assess cognitive and emotional states for improved safety and user experience. Electrodermal activity (EDA) is a particularly informative biomarker of arousal but is conventionally measured with skin-contact electrodes, limiting its applicability in vehicles. This work explores the feasibility of non-contact EDA estimation using Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) as a novel sensing modality. In a controlled laboratory setup, LiDAR reflection intensity from the forehead was recorded simultaneously with conventional finger-based EDA. Both classification and regression tasks were performed as follows: feature-based machine learning models (e.g., Random Forest and Extra Trees) and sequence-based deep learning models (e.g., CNN, LSTM, and TCN) were evaluated. Results demonstrate that LiDAR signals capture arousal-related changes, with the best regression model (Temporal Convolutional Network) achieving a mean absolute error of 14.6 on the normalized arousal factor scale (–50 to +50) and a correlation of r = 0.85 with ground-truth EDA. While random split validations yielded high accuracy, performance under leave-one-subject-out evaluation highlighted challenges in cross-subject generalization. The algorithms themselves were not the primary research focus but served to establish feasibility of the approach. These findings provide the first proof-of-concept that LiDAR can remotely estimate EDA-based arousal without direct skin contact, addressing a central limitation of current driver monitoring systems. Future research should focus on larger datasets, multimodal integration, and real-world driving validation to advance LiDAR towards practical in-vehicle deployment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brandstetter et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: