Systematic review reveals machine learning models enhance anomaly detection and resource management in 5G cellular networks.
5G technology represents a transformative shift in mobile communications, delivering improved ultra-low latency, data throughput, and the capacity to support huge device connectivity, surpassing the capabilities of LTE systems. As global telecommunication operators shift toward widespread 5G implementation, ensuring optimal network performance and intelligent resource management has become increasingly obvious. To address these challenges, this study explored the role of advanced clustering methods in optimizing cellular networks under heterogeneous and dynamic conditions. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted by analyzing 40 peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed studies selected from an initial collection of 500 papers retrieved from the Semantic Scholar Open Research Corpus. This review examines a diversity of clustering approaches, including spectral clustering with Bayesian non-parametric models and K-means, density-based clustering such as DBSCAN, and deep representation-based methods like Differential Evolution Memetic Clustering (DEMC) and Domain Adaptive Neighborhood Clustering via Entropy Optimization (DANCE). Key performance outcomes reported across studies include anomaly detection accuracy of up to 98.8%, delivery rate improvements of up to 89.4%, and handover prediction accuracy improvements of approximately 43%, particularly when clustering techniques are combined with machine learning models. In addition to summarizing their effectiveness, this review highlights methodological trends in clustering parameters, mechanisms, experimental setups, and quality metrics. The findings suggest that advanced clustering models play a crucial role in intelligent spectrum sensing, adaptive mobility management, and efficient resource allocation, thereby contributing meaningfully to the development of intelligent 5G/6G mobile network infrastructures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nawej et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: