Analysis of biodiversity reveals diverse dietary items in evening grosbeaks, highlighting seasonal variations.
Community-sourced biodiversity imagery has expanded rapidly in the past decade, facilitating analyses of ecology on unprecedented spatial scales. Proliferation of these databases has also helped to reveal understudied or previously overlooked aspects of many species’ basic biology. The Evening Grosbeak (Hesperiphona vespertina) is considered to be a species of conservation concern, and many aspects of its diet have yet to be investigated, including how its diet varies seasonally and across its large North American range. The Evening Grosbeak’s striking plumage, frequent occurrences at bird feeders, and nomadic behavior all make them popular targets of bird photographers and a prime species for study using large community-sourced archives. We reviewed more than 50,000 photographs of Evening Grosbeaks archived in the Macaulay Library, a large public database, to gain a more detailed understanding of the diet of this species. While most Evening Grosbeak images found in the Macaulay Library depicted birds foraging at bird feeders, 1075 images were found to be of birds consuming natural (non-feeder) food items. We mapped the location of these natural dietary items to four distinct regions within the Evening Grosbeak’s geographical range and found a diet consisting of at least 96 species of plants from 25 families, 1 species of insect, and 2 species of lichen from 1 family. Despite the high diversity of dietary items we identified, richness estimators suggest even greater diversity of dietary foods exists, especially in the Pacific Northwest. Using these data and published literature on the Evening Grosbeak’s diet, we discuss the characteristics of preferred Evening Grosbeak dietary items, as well as the advantages and limitations of using community-science data for such analyses. To our knowledge, this is the first range-wide, descriptive study of a songbird species’ diet using photographs made publicly available in a community-sourced archive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Young et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: