This review highlights barriers to quality improvement publication in burn care, suggesting strategies to enhance evidence-based practices and project planning.
Quality improvement (QI) is essential to advancing burn care, yet most locally successful QI initiatives are not disseminated beyond individual centres. Although QI activity is common in burn care, only a small proportion of projects progress to peer-reviewed publication. This restricts shared learning and slows the spread of evidence-based, context-adaptable practices. We highlight persistent barriers to QI publication, including unclear reporting expectations and limited reviewer familiarity with improvement methodology. To address this gap, we propose three practical strategies for burn centres: intentionally developing 1–2 publishable QI projects annually, adopting SQUIRE 2.0 as a reporting scaffold, and expanding QI-trained peer reviewer capacity. We also present a 10-Point QII Scoring Framework to guide project planning and scholarly dissemination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alan D. Rogers (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: