Analysis reveals differential gene expression patterns in reproductive organs, suggesting implications for molecular evolution and paternal care strategies.
Introduction: Sexual conflict is pervasive and can favor the evolution of differential gene expression patterns between males and females. The evolution of such sex-biased expression patterns is constrained by pleiotropic functions of differentially expressed genes, such as widespread expression across tissues. Methods: We investigated sex-biased gene expression and its relationship to tissue specificity in reproductive and somatic organs in the Northern pipefish, Syngnathus fuscus, a polygynandrous species with extreme paternal care and no evidence of sex chromosomes – conditions ripe for intra-locus sexual conflict. Results: We found patterns of sex-biased expression in the gonads, liver, and gills of the Northern pipefish, with the largest number of sex-biased genes identified in the gonads. In general, sex-biased genes were only more tissue-specific in the reproductive tissues (gonads), but not in either of the somatic tissues (liver or gills). Sex-biased genes with evidence of branch-specific selection were also more tissue specific. Discussion: We highlight the potential for different sex-specific selection pressures to be acting on each tissue type as there were widespread differences in the protein classes represented by sex-biased genes across both organs and sexes, although sex-biased genes did not experience stronger episodic selection than unbiased genes. Furthermore, our results support the hypothesis that broad expression can constrain the molecular evolution of a gene. The work presented here supports the potential for sex-biased gene expression to act as a mechanism for phenotypic differentiation between the sexes and increases our knowledge of patterns of gene expression in an unusual group of fishes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tosto et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: