Analysis reveals 9.5% prevalence of neurocognitive disorders among Quechua-speaking older adults, suggesting the importance of the Q-RUDAS tool for accurate assessment.
Background:The Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) is a validated cognitive screening tool for illiterate and low-educated individuals, adaptable across languages and cultures. In Peru, we adapted it for Quechua speakers (Q-RUDAS) to assess cognitive status in older adults. Objective: We aimed to estimate the prevalence of neurocognitive disorders—mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia—among Quechua-speaking older adults in one of the most socially vulnerable districts of Peru using the Quechua version of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (Q-RUDAS), a brief cognitive screening tool validated in Peru. Methods: We studied 511 participants from Puno a region in the southern Peruvian Andes (mean age 65.04 ± 6.73 years; 80.4% females), collecting sociodemographic data and Q-RUDAS scores. After excluding 18 individuals with medical conditions that could affect cognitive performance, such as neurological, psychiatric, or cerebrovascular disorders, 493 completed the test. Results: All Q-RUDAS items were well understood, although over 50% of participants struggled with visuospatial construction. The mean Q-RUDAS score was 26.01 ± 2.71. Of the participants, 446 (90.5%) scored within normal ranges (26.67 ± 1.92), 41 (8.3%) were classified as having mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (21.49 ± 1.92), and 6 (1.2%) as having dementia (17.00 ± 2.71) based on established Q-RUDAS cut-offs. Urban participants scored higher. The prevalence of MCI and dementia combined was 9.52%. Conclusions: The Q-RUDAS is a culturally sensitive tool that can support the identification of cognitive impairment in Indigenous populations. Our findings highlight the need for further cross-validation studies to refine diagnostic accuracy in Quechua-speaking populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zegarra-Valdivia et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: