This framework demonstrates that identity influences memory retrieval and forgetting, indicating coherent memory management in cognitive systems.
Memory in computational and biological systems is often treated as passive storage rather than a coherence-regulated dynamic process. Existing approaches—including raw buffers, vector similarity retrieval, statistical models, and classical psychological frameworks—lack a scalar invariant for determining when a memory trace remains valid, when it should be updated, and when it must be forgotten. This paper introduces a deterministic memory architecture grounded in two invariants: PAS_h, a harmonic coherence metric, and ΔPAS_zeta, a drift measure governing temporal divergence. Memory is formulated as a three-layer system—episodic, semantic, and identity—each regulated by explicit coherence thresholds and drift bounds. Retrieval becomes a legality operation rather than similarity search, updating follows echo-based stabilization, and forgetting occurs deterministically once drift exceeds a defined corridor. This framework unifies classical models (episodic/semantic distinctions, working memory), neural network theories (attractors, complementary learning systems), reconsolidation dynamics, and entropy-minimization accounts under a single invariant-based law. The result is a general, implementable model of memory as coherence preserved through time, suitable for deterministic inference substrates and long-horizon reasoning systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bostick, Devin (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: