PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 3, 2025Oral3 citationsOpen Access

PRF Membranes Enhance Postoperative Recovery After Periapical Surgery: A Single-Blind Randomized Pilot Trial Using 3D Imaging

View Full Paper
MMMartin MajorMPM. I. PolyakGKGábor Kammerhofer

Key Points

  • PRF membranes significantly reduced pain and swelling after apicoectomy, improving postoperative recovery.
  • The PRF group experienced lower pain scores (VAS: 1.80 vs. 3.80) with p-values indicating statistical significance.
  • Randomized controlled trial utilized 3D facial scanning to quantify swelling and PROMIS-29+2 for quality of life assessment.
  • These findings indicate PRF membranes may promote tissue repair, calling for larger multicenter trials to validate results.

Abstract

Background: Periapical surgery is indicated for persistent periapical lesions that do not respond to conventional endodontic therapy, yet postoperative recovery is often hindered by pain, swelling, and delayed healing. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membranes are autologous biomaterials with regenerative potential, capable of modulating inflammation and promoting tissue repair. Methods: This preliminary randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of PRF membranes in improving postoperative outcomes—specifically pain, swelling, and quality of life—after apicoectomy. Twenty patients requiring periapical surgery were randomly allocated to a PRF group (n = 10) or a control group (n = 10). In the PRF group, autologous PRF membranes were applied over the resected root-end and into the osteotomy cavity before flap closure. In the control group, no PRF membranes or any additional biomaterial were applied, apart from the standard root-end filling material (MTA), which was identically used in both groups as part of the routine apicoectomy protocol. All patients were blinded to allocation, and outcomes were assessed by an independent blinded evaluator. Facial swelling was quantified by 3D facial scanning, pain was recorded daily using a visual analog scale (VAS), and quality of life was evaluated with the PROMIS-29+2 Profile. Results: The PRF group showed significantly reduced swelling (mean volume difference, 7.12 cm3; p = 0.025), lower pain scores (VAS: 1.80 ± 1.22 vs. 3.80 ± 2.44; p = 0.034), and improved quality-of-life domains, including higher Physical Function (p = 0.032) and lower Sleep Disturbance (p = 0.008) scores. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this pilot study, PRF membranes enhanced postoperative recovery after periapical surgery by reducing swelling and pain while improving patient-reported outcomes. Larger multicenter trials are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Major et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/694025972d562116f28fea3dhttps://doi.org/10.3390/oral5040098
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Continuous Locking Suture Technique2001 · 3 citations
  2. 2Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): A second-generation platelet concentrate. Part III: Leucocyte activation: A new feature for platelet concentrates?2006 · 725 citations
  3. 3Non‐surgical root canal treatment and retreatment versus apical surgery in treating apical periodontitis: A systematic review2022 · 44 citations
  4. 4Current Concepts of Periapical Surgery2020 · 10 citations
  5. 5PROMIS®-29 v2.0 profile physical and mental health summary scores2018 · 701 citations