The framework demonstrates fluid–structure interaction and displacement in gas foil bearings, suggesting increased clearance boosts stability.
This paper proposes a comprehensive framework, Theory–Simulation–Experimental Verification, for the elasto-aerodynamic analysis of elastic foil gas bearings (EFGBs). In contrast to many studies that approximate the foil structure using simplified two-dimensional models, the present work adopts a macro-element beam theory model that incorporates the actual 3D geometry, nonlinear elasticity, and frictional contact effects, and couples it directly with the Reynolds equation. To improve accuracy and robustness, the macro-beam results are validated against a fully coupled fluid–structure interaction (FSI) model developed in COMSOL Multiphysics. Emphasis is placed on quantifying the influence of foil thickness, clearance, and eccentricity, where the pressure distribution, foil deflection, and load capacity are obtained through the coupled solver. The results reveal that increasing foil thickness from 0.1 mm to 0.2 mm elevates the peak gas film pressure from 1.36 × 105 Pa to 1.97 × 105 Pa while simultaneously reducing displacement and pressure fluctuations, thereby enhancing bearing stability. Smaller clearances are shown to increase load capacity but also induce stronger oscillatory flow behavior, indicating a stiffness–stability trade-off. Additionally, prototype experiments with a 0.05 mm clearance confirm practical lift-off at 4300–7000 rpm under 10–30 N external loads, with measured torques of 0.18–0.30 N·m. By combining computational efficiency, 3D fidelity, and experimental validation, the proposed framework provides quantitative guidance for the design and optimization of EFGBs used in high-speed turbomachinery, such as aviation and compact energy systems, including turbine-based air-cycle refrigeration units and small gas-turbine rotors for unmanned aerial vehicles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: