EQPU – 0DSTL Architecture: Deterministic Quantum-Analog Computing Framework (v9)

Update Notice – Version 9 — GenX Non-entangled Qubits Architecture Join the 0DSTL Architecture Community: A physically based, deterministic architecture built around 0DSTL.Researchers can submit prototypes, simulation results, implementation studies, and related computational models. 🔗 Community: https://zenodo.org/communities/0dstl-architecture For submissions or review requests, please contact:📎 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sebastiano-torrisi-06073a2a1/📧 Email: info@0dstl.de Version 9 introduces a proximity-based, interaction-driven qubit model.Qubits are arranged in X/Y/L formations, where natural wavefunction overlap allows state propagation without entanglement, superposition, or Hilbert-space operations. Q1 is externally modulated; Qn is measured.Intermediate elements follow through physical interaction, not entanglement-driven interference. This model serves as an QC or optional hybrid extension to the analog/neuromorphic GenX core.It provides a physically realistic research pathway, avoiding the fragility of multi-qubit entanglement and QEC dependence. An overlapped copy can be used as an ECC-like (error-correcting) mechanism.Important: interaction-driven, not entangled.Two units (X1, X1ECC *not pulsed, possibly inverted logic.*) operate in parallel, slightly coupled, but not coherently linked. If X1 output = X1ECC output → valid result If X1 output ≠ X1ECC output → invalid → re-run GenX provides, for the first time, a way to compare two real quantum-computing models directly.While a simulator can pointlessly “simulate” 100^100 states,GenX–QC vs. Default–QC delivers actual, physically meaningful comparative results. With GenX you already expect higher performance due to its minimal error propagation.But the real value is this: if GenX and a Default-QC produce the same results, and you filter out the noise of the Default-QC, you can directly measure whether the Default-QC actually performs more computation at all.If it doesn’t, that is further evidence that the claimed 2ⁿ computational power is mathematical — but not physically usable. After that, you can benchmark GenX against a 1ⁿ-simulator to see whether its correlation–driven behavior provides advantages in specific tasks.The real problem today is even worse than “QC is faster”:If 2ⁿ exists only as a mathematical construct — which is very, very likely — then current QC simulators are effectively simulating multiverses that will never exist physically. Updated material: GenX Non-entangled.pdf Summary Most recent relevant documents: V1. LTspice Simulations (QC vs. GenX).pdf EQPU_0DSTL_Simulation_Results_arXiv.pdf 0DSTL_Vs_Default_Ceff.pdf V5. Whitepaper_EQPU_0DSTL V5.pdf V6. 0DSTL Security & Extras.pdf V7. The first complete analog transformer core (Digital intepreted) xxxxxx Bit In, xxxxxx Bits Out Full_Analog_Digital_Operation_Formalization.pdf LTspice Simulation V4.rar V8. Analog Sigma Delta Core Appendix_A_0DSTL.pdf LTspice Simulation V4.rar Table — Interaction-Correlation (GenX) vs. Entanglement-Correlation (Today’s QC) Feature Today’s Quantum Computing 0DSTL GenX (Interaction-Driven Correlation) Correlation Mechanism Entanglement-based correlation Physical interaction-based correlation Stability Highly fragile, decoheres quickly Robust, classical-scale stability Control Requirements Requires precise phase control over all entangled amplitudes Simple local manipulation of one qubit; interaction propagates correlation Scalability Exponential overhead (QEC, synchronisation, cryogenics) Linear/near-linear; no superposition or QEC required Information Flow Interpreted as 2ⁿ amplitudes → collapses to 1ⁿ on measurement Always 1ⁿ trajectories → deterministic continuum transformation Measurement Sensitivity Measurement destroys entanglement state Measurement does not disrupt interaction correlation Physical Implementation Requires cryogenics, shielding, nanosecond-synchronisation CMOS-compatible, room-temperature capable Use of Superposition Essential mathematical component Not required; correlation arises from physical coupling Error Propagation Amplified by entanglement depth Minimized — only local errors, no entangled cascade Practicality Lab-demonstration scale Engineering-scale, deterministic architecture **Legal Notice:** The deterministic digital/analog 0DSTL logic topology and the EQPU architecture described herein are protected under German Utility Model registration (DPMA, 30 Sep 2025). Reproduction, redistribution, modification, or commercial implementation without prior written consent of the inventor is strictly prohibited.