Experimental analysis shows energy absorption in thermoplastic composites using polycarbonate and polyvinyl butyral, indicating superior performance from fiber-reinforced materials.
The assessment of the dynamic mechanical performance of fiber-reinforced composites has gained importance in specific high-tech applications like aerospace and automobiles. However, three dimensional (3D) auxetic reinforcements offering viable performance have remained unexplored. Hence, this study investigates the energy absorption capabilities and high strain impact behaviors of 3D woven fabric-reinforced composites. Three different types of 3D woven reinforcements i.e., warp interlock (Wp), weft interlock (Wt), and bidirectional interlock (Bi) were developed from jute yarn, and their corresponding composites were fabricated using polycarbonate (PC) and polyvinyl butyral (PVB). Out-of-plane auxeticity was measured for reinforcements while composites were analyzed under dynamic tests. Wp exhibited the highest auxeticity with a value of −1.29, Bi showed the least auxeticity with a value of −0.31, while Wt entailed an intermediate value of −0.46 owing to variable interlacement patterns. The dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) results revealed that composite samples developed with PC resin showed a higher storage modulus with the least tan delta values less than 0.2, while PVB-based samples exhibited higher loss modulus with tan delta values of 0.6. Split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) results showed that, under 2 and 4 bar pressure tests, PVB-based composites exhibited the highest maximum load while PC-based composites exhibited the least. Warp interlock-based composites with higher auxeticity showed better energy absorption when compared with the bidirectional interlock reinforcement based (with lower auxeticity) composites that exhibited lower peak load and energy dissipation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abbas et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: